links mentioned in this episode:<\/h2>\n\n- New Insights into the Hebrew Bible conference<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
episode description<\/h2>\n
Disclaimer: We use an AI generation tool for episode summaries.<\/p>\n
Episode 174 of\u00a0Misquoting Jesus<\/em> explores a striking and often overlooked difference between the Gospels of Mark and Luke: Luke appears to reject the idea that Jesus\u2019 death was an atoning sacrifice for sins. Bart Ehrman argues that while Mark presents Jesus\u2019 death as a ransom paid on behalf of humanity, Luke systematically removes or reshapes those passages<\/strong> when rewriting Mark\u2019s Gospel.<\/p>\nThe episode explains the doctrine of atonement in accessible terms before diving into specific examples. Ehrman highlights how Luke edits Mark 10:45, removes sacrificial language from the Last Supper tradition, and reframes the crucifixion itself. In Mark, Jesus\u2019 death opens access to God through sacrifice; in Luke, Jesus dies as an innocent victim whose unjust execution should move people to repentance.<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.bartehrman.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/MJ.png\" "\\"MJ\\"")
<\/p>\n
Misquoting Jesus<\/p>\n
Never Miss an Episode of Misquoting Jesus<\/p>\n
Get key insights, episode summaries, and exclusive content you won’t hear on the podcast.<\/p>\n
__CONFIG_colors_palette__{“active_palette”:0,”config”:{“colors”:{“68c4b”:{“name”:”Main accent”,”parent”:-1},”847d2″:{“name”:”Accent Light”,”parent”:”68c4b”,”lock”:{“lightness”:1,”saturation”:1}}},”gradients”:[]},”palettes”:[{“name”:”Default”,”value”:{“colors”:{“68c4b”:{“val”:”var(–tcb-skin-color-0)”},”847d2″:{“val”:”rgb(248, 245, 241)”,”hsl_parent_dependency”:{“h”:34,”l”:0.96,”s”:0.33}}},”gradients”:[]},”original”:{“colors”:{“68c4b”:{“val”:”rgb(47, 138, 229)”,”hsl”:{“h”:210,”s”:0.77,”l”:0.54,”a”:1}},”847d2″:{“val”:”rgb(243, 246, 249)”,”hsl_parent_dependency”:{“h”:209,”s”:0.33,”l”:0.96,”a”:1}}},”gradients”:[]}}]}__CONFIG_colors_palette__ __CONFIG_colors_palette__{“active_palette”:0,”config”:{“colors”:{“3e1f8”:{“name”:”Main Accent”,”parent”:-1}},”gradients”:[]},”palettes”:[{“name”:”Default Palette”,”value”:{“colors”:{“3e1f8”:{“val”:”rgb(199, 149, 47)”,”hsl”:{“h”:40,”s”:0.6179,”l”:0.4824,”a”:1}}},”gradients”:[]},”original”:{“colors”:{“3e1f8”:{“val”:”rgb(19, 114, 211)”,”hsl”:{“h”:210,”s”:0.83,”l”:0.45}}},”gradients”:[]}}]}__CONFIG_colors_palette__ Join 50,000+ listeners <\/a><\/p>\nBy signing up, you agree to receive marketing emails. Unsubscribe anytime.<\/em><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.bartehrman.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Bart-Ehrman-and-Megan-Lewis.png\" "\\"Bart")
<\/p>\n
PLUS: Get our free course:<\/p>\n
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John Actually Write the Gospels?<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.bartehrman.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/Did-MMLJ-Actually-Write-the-Gospels.png\" "\\"Did")
<\/p>\n
PLUS: Get our free course:<\/p>\n
Did Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John Actually Write the Gospels?<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
A major focus is Luke 22:19\u201320, where some manuscripts contain explicit atonement language (\u201cgiven for you\u201d and \u201cshed for you\u201d). Ehrman argues these verses were later additions inserted by scribes because they contradict Luke\u2019s broader theology and are absent from some of the earliest manuscripts.<\/p>\n
The conversation ultimately raises larger theological questions: Does God require sacrifice to forgive sins, or does repentance alone restore people to God? Ehrman suggests Luke\u2019s theology may actually be closer to the teachings of the historical Jesus<\/strong> than the sacrificial theology found in Paul and Mark.<\/p>\nThe bonus Q&A covers whether Jesus could read and write, what language Jesus and Pilate likely spoke during the trial, and why scholars still use the traditional Gospel names Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.<\/p>\n
ready to dive deeper?<\/h2>\n
Related Courses offered by Bart Ehrman and\/or Paths in Biblical Studies:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n- Luke’s Maverick Gospel<\/a><\/li>\n
- The Mysteries of the Synoptic Gospels: Discovering Matthew, Mark, and Luke<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Related Articles (Free Resources): <\/strong><\/p>\n\n- Redaction Criticism: Exploring the Theological edits of the Gospel Authors<\/a><\/li>\n
- Soteriology: Exploring the Study of Salvation in the Bible<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
ways to watch or listen to the misquoting jesus podcast:<\/h2>\n\n- Watch on YouTube<\/a><\/li>\n
- Spotify<\/a> (audio only)<\/li>\n
- Apple Podcasts<\/a> (audio only)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
And many more! \u00a0Just search for the show title in your favorite podcast app!<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Surprising Reason Luke Removed Atonement from His Gospel (vIDEO) Welcome to the home of Episode 174 of the Misquoting Jesus Podcast with Bart Ehrman. \u00a0Below, you can watch the entire episode, read its description, and see links to related resources. links mentioned in this episode: New Insights into the Hebrew Bible conference episode description […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":25478,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","tve_updated_post":"
\n\t__CONFIG_colors_palette__{\"active_palette\":0,\"config\":{\"colors\":{\"62516\":{\"name\":\"Main Accent\",\"parent\":-1}},\"gradients\":[]},\"palettes\":[{\"name\":\"Default Palette\",\"value\":{\"colors\":{\"62516\":{\"val\":\"var(--tcb-skin-color-0)\"}},\"gradients\":[]}}]}__CONFIG_colors_palette__<\/div>\n\t\n\t\t
episode description<\/h2>\n
Disclaimer: We use an AI generation tool for episode summaries.<\/p>\n
Episode 174 of\u00a0Misquoting Jesus<\/em> explores a striking and often overlooked difference between the Gospels of Mark and Luke: Luke appears to reject the idea that Jesus\u2019 death was an atoning sacrifice for sins. Bart Ehrman argues that while Mark presents Jesus\u2019 death as a ransom paid on behalf of humanity, Luke systematically removes or reshapes those passages<\/strong> when rewriting Mark\u2019s Gospel.<\/p>\n The episode explains the doctrine of atonement in accessible terms before diving into specific examples. Ehrman highlights how Luke edits Mark 10:45, removes sacrificial language from the Last Supper tradition, and reframes the crucifixion itself. In Mark, Jesus\u2019 death opens access to God through sacrifice; in Luke, Jesus dies as an innocent victim whose unjust execution should move people to repentance.<\/p>\n Misquoting Jesus<\/p>\n Never Miss an Episode of Misquoting Jesus<\/p>\n Get key insights, episode summaries, and exclusive content you won’t hear on the podcast.<\/p>\n __CONFIG_colors_palette__{“active_palette”:0,”config”:{“colors”:{“68c4b”:{“name”:”Main accent”,”parent”:-1},”847d2″:{“name”:”Accent Light”,”parent”:”68c4b”,”lock”:{“lightness”:1,”saturation”:1}}},”gradients”:[]},”palettes”:[{“name”:”Default”,”value”:{“colors”:{“68c4b”:{“val”:”var(–tcb-skin-color-0)”},”847d2″:{“val”:”rgb(248, 245, 241)”,”hsl_parent_dependency”:{“h”:34,”l”:0.96,”s”:0.33}}},”gradients”:[]},”original”:{“colors”:{“68c4b”:{“val”:”rgb(47, 138, 229)”,”hsl”:{“h”:210,”s”:0.77,”l”:0.54,”a”:1}},”847d2″:{“val”:”rgb(243, 246, 249)”,”hsl_parent_dependency”:{“h”:209,”s”:0.33,”l”:0.96,”a”:1}}},”gradients”:[]}}]}__CONFIG_colors_palette__ __CONFIG_colors_palette__{“active_palette”:0,”config”:{“colors”:{“3e1f8”:{“name”:”Main Accent”,”parent”:-1}},”gradients”:[]},”palettes”:[{“name”:”Default Palette”,”value”:{“colors”:{“3e1f8”:{“val”:”rgb(199, 149, 47)”,”hsl”:{“h”:40,”s”:0.6179,”l”:0.4824,”a”:1}}},”gradients”:[]},”original”:{“colors”:{“3e1f8”:{“val”:”rgb(19, 114, 211)”,”hsl”:{“h”:210,”s”:0.83,”l”:0.45}}},”gradients”:[]}}]}__CONFIG_colors_palette__ Join 50,000+ listeners <\/a><\/p>\n By signing up, you agree to receive marketing emails. Unsubscribe anytime.<\/em><\/p>\n PLUS: Get our free course:<\/p>\n Did Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John Actually Write the Gospels?<\/p>\n PLUS: Get our free course:<\/p>\n Did Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John Actually Write the Gospels?<\/p>\n A major focus is Luke 22:19\u201320, where some manuscripts contain explicit atonement language (\u201cgiven for you\u201d and \u201cshed for you\u201d). Ehrman argues these verses were later additions inserted by scribes because they contradict Luke\u2019s broader theology and are absent from some of the earliest manuscripts.<\/p>\n The conversation ultimately raises larger theological questions: Does God require sacrifice to forgive sins, or does repentance alone restore people to God? Ehrman suggests Luke\u2019s theology may actually be closer to the teachings of the historical Jesus<\/strong> than the sacrificial theology found in Paul and Mark.<\/p>\n The bonus Q&A covers whether Jesus could read and write, what language Jesus and Pilate likely spoke during the trial, and why scholars still use the traditional Gospel names Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.<\/p>\n Related Courses offered by Bart Ehrman and\/or Paths in Biblical Studies:<\/strong><\/p>\n Related Articles (Free Resources): <\/strong><\/p>\n And many more! \u00a0Just search for the show title in your favorite podcast app!<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The Surprising Reason Luke Removed Atonement from His Gospel (vIDEO) Welcome to the home of Episode 174 of the Misquoting Jesus Podcast with Bart Ehrman. \u00a0Below, you can watch the entire episode, read its description, and see links to related resources. links mentioned in this episode: New Insights into the Hebrew Bible conference episode description […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":25478,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","tve_updated_post":"<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\nready to dive deeper?<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
ways to watch or listen to the misquoting jesus podcast:<\/h2>\n
\n